Talk:Osho Timeline 1977: Difference between revisions

From The Sannyas Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(QUESTION: About an anomaly in ''I Say Unto You)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
As mentioned in the article page, some uncertainty exists about which venue in Shree Rajneesh Ashram was used for Hindi discourses in Pune One. As of this writing, no reliable source has been found for this information. Anecdotal sources and memory suggest different things, and the announcements (of dates and venues) at the beginnings of discourse tapes have been expunged by Pune authorities, citing (as they do) Osho's guidance.  
As mentioned in the article page, some uncertainty exists about which venue in Shree Rajneesh Ashram was used for Hindi discourses in Pune One. As of this writing, no reliable source has been found for this information. Anecdotal sources and memory suggest different things, and the announcements (of dates and venues) at the beginnings of discourse tapes have been expunged by Pune authorities, citing (as they do) Osho's guidance.  


The [[Osho Books on CD-ROM|CD-ROM]] does state venues but only for English original talks and those Hindi talks that had been translated as of 1993 or so, only about thirty and most of them preceding Pune One. As of the CD-ROM's creation, there were no Hindi series from 1978 that had been translated. ''[[Jagat Taraiya Bhor Ki (जगत तरैया भोर की)]]'' was translated shortly after the CD-ROM came out, but no cigar. We have to note that at the beginning of the Pune One period, neither Buddha Hall nor Chuang Tzu had been built, but the CD-ROM has the very first discourses in both English and Hindi in Buddha Hall, so the CD-ROM may have reliability issues as well.  
The [[Osho Books on CD-ROM|CD-ROM]] does state venues but only for English original talks and those Hindi talks that had been translated as of 1993 or so, only about thirty and most of them preceding Pune One. As of the CD-ROM's creation, there were no Hindi series from 1977 that had been translated. ''[[Jagat Taraiya Bhor Ki (जगत तरैया भोर की)]]'' was translated shortly after the CD-ROM came out, but no cigar. We have to note that at the beginning of the Pune One period, neither Buddha Hall nor Chuang Tzu had been built, but the CD-ROM has the very first discourses in both English and Hindi in Buddha Hall, so the CD-ROM may have reliability issues as well.  


A more in-depth exploration of this theme can be found at [[Buddha Hall and Chuang Tzu Auditorium|the page on these venues]].
A more in-depth exploration of this theme can be found at [[Buddha Hall and Chuang Tzu Auditorium|the page on these venues]].

Revision as of 23:42, 12 February 2015

As mentioned in the article page, some uncertainty exists about which venue in Shree Rajneesh Ashram was used for Hindi discourses in Pune One. As of this writing, no reliable source has been found for this information. Anecdotal sources and memory suggest different things, and the announcements (of dates and venues) at the beginnings of discourse tapes have been expunged by Pune authorities, citing (as they do) Osho's guidance.

The CD-ROM does state venues but only for English original talks and those Hindi talks that had been translated as of 1993 or so, only about thirty and most of them preceding Pune One. As of the CD-ROM's creation, there were no Hindi series from 1977 that had been translated. Jagat Taraiya Bhor Ki (जगत तरैया भोर की) was translated shortly after the CD-ROM came out, but no cigar. We have to note that at the beginning of the Pune One period, neither Buddha Hall nor Chuang Tzu had been built, but the CD-ROM has the very first discourses in both English and Hindi in Buddha Hall, so the CD-ROM may have reliability issues as well.

A more in-depth exploration of this theme can be found at the page on these venues.




QUESTION: About a particular anomaly in the English series, I Say Unto You Vols 1 and 2: Article pages on Vols 1 and 2 discuss a certain mangling of data about how many and which discourse dates in each Vol. The timeline rendition (Osho Discourses 1977 article) seems to have adopted a new view again, ie unrelated to the possibilities discussed in the Vol 1 and Vol 2 articles, needs to be sorted out and/or explained here, istm. -- doofus-9 (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)