Help talk:Contents Books: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "there are alternatives for just about everything, so eg <nowiki><nowiki>|</nowiki></nowiki> could be more compact as <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. --Sarlo ---- where...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
where exactly did you see this? looks more like advanced templating.--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 18:07, 13 January 2015 (PST) | where exactly did you see this? looks more like advanced templating.--[[User:Rudra|Rudra]] ([[User talk:Rudra|talk]]) 18:07, 13 January 2015 (PST) | ||
---- | |||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Table] section 2 is a pipe syntax tutorial and 2.1 a subsection specifically dealing with "rendering pipe itself." Four ways! (After the odd bit on "format," which didn't illuminate anything for me.) Not any kind of templating, but seeing now the preview after taking out the "extra" nowikis you inserted, i see where you got that idea. And looking closely at their example, it looks a bit flawed: first word in each row has got lost, and the first pipe as well. I guess they have created a template called "!" for this purpose. Maybe the special characters would be better. -- [[User:Sarlo|doofus-9]] ([[User talk:Sarlo|talk]]) 19:56, 13 January 2015 (PST) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 03:56, 14 January 2015
there are alternatives for just about everything, so eg <nowiki>|</nowiki> could be more compact as {{!}}. --Sarlo
where exactly did you see this? looks more like advanced templating.--Rudra (talk) 18:07, 13 January 2015 (PST)
[1] section 2 is a pipe syntax tutorial and 2.1 a subsection specifically dealing with "rendering pipe itself." Four ways! (After the odd bit on "format," which didn't illuminate anything for me.) Not any kind of templating, but seeing now the preview after taking out the "extra" nowikis you inserted, i see where you got that idea. And looking closely at their example, it looks a bit flawed: first word in each row has got lost, and the first pipe as well. I guess they have created a template called "!" for this purpose. Maybe the special characters would be better. -- doofus-9 (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2015 (PST)
